Re: PATCH reduce sa-awl memory usage

> I thought dev-list would be appropriate place to send a patch, haven't
> found clear guidelines, sorry. Submitting a ticket now.
No apology needed.  I think you perfectly discussed things and this is
worthy of a bug.
> Just for reference, "12% slower" in benchmark I performed is a 26
> seconds vs 29 seconds case and yet
> it saves 1G of RAM. Two-three times larger database and sa-awl process
> won't even fit in a 32-bit virtual
> address space.
A good reason why we need to make this an option.

Regards,
KAM