|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: PERFORCE change 136345 for review (fwd)On 2008-02-28 22:17, wrote:
> On 2008-02-27 11:54, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Tomas, > > > > Following a CVS update from the Arla anoncvs, I needed the attached patch > > to build on FreeBSD. I still have the following further local changes in > > my tree still: > > > > - Remove nnpfs_deb.h include from fs_local.h. > > > > - Add /usr/include to various paths so that machine/whatever.h includes > > properly. > > > > - #ifdef NNPFS_DEBUG around local variables in nnpfs_lk_info to avoid unused > > variables warning/error. > > I've been playing with this some tonight. My current thought about > dealing with the "machine/whatever.h" includes is to copy the > pertinent headers out of the kernel sources (via $SYS) at the same > time configure generates vnode_if.h. Any thoughts about that > approach? It's kinda unfortunate that these headers aren't inside > a machine/ directory in /sys; then we could -I these directly from > /sys. Does anyone have any idea how this used to work? > > I haven't loked at the NNPFS_DEBUG related issues yet, but I will. creating my machine/ hack. I suppose a symlink would be more appropriate than a copy for that. Robert, did you need your other changes to get Arla to compile, or were there just warnings you were itching to fix? It's time to shovel snow, but I'll be back at this tomorrow evening. If we can come to an agreement on the machine includes and the nnpfs_debug stuff, tomorrow night I should be able to implement whatever we decide on and update the ports accordingly. After that, I guess it's send-pr time for arla and the ports maintainers. :) (Oh yeah, my change is just this: oldothello% diff -u cf/*.orig cf/bsd-header-vnode-if-h.m4 --- cf/bsd-header-vnode-if-h.m4.orig 2008-02-28 23:01:01.000000000 -0600 +++ cf/bsd-header-vnode-if-h.m4 2008-02-28 22:42:32.000000000 -0600 @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -h awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -p awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -q + ln -sf $SYS/$(uname -m)/include machine else AC_MSG_ERROR(unable to find any vnode_if script) fi oldothello% ) -- Alec Kloss alec@... IM: angryspamhater@... PGP key at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA241980E "No Bunny!" -- Simon, from Frisky Dingo |
|
|
Re: PERFORCE change 136345 for review (fwd)On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 23:02 -0600, Alec Kloss wrote:
> +++ cf/bsd-header-vnode-if-h.m4 2008-02-28 22:42:32.000000000 -0600 > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -h > awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -p > awk -f $SYS/tools/vnode_if.awk $SYS/kern/vnode_if.src -q > + ln -sf $SYS/$(uname -m)/include machine > else > AC_MSG_ERROR(unable to find any vnode_if script) > fi Good idea, maybe an odd place to put it -- unexpected side effect given the file/macro name. On the other hand, I have no idea where I would put it. The beautiful long term solution may be adding some kind of lightweight 'generate headers' target for the kernel build so external projects don't need to reinvent the wheel? Or maybe arla is just a very strange one. NNPFS_DEBUG is (hopefully) taken care of. /t _______________________________________________ freebsd-afs@... mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-afs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-afs-unsubscribe@..." |
|
|
Re: PERFORCE change 136345 for review (fwd)On 2008-02-29 08:08, Tomas Olsson wrote:
> Good idea, maybe an odd place to put it -- unexpected side effect given > the file/macro name. On the other hand, I have no idea where I would put > it. Putting it next to vnode_if.h seems to make sense. Having vnode_if.h where it is in arla seems a little odd. I guess I'd consider moving both down to somewhere like nnpfs/sys or nnpfs/kernel or something. But that's all pretty much just cosmetics. > The beautiful long term solution may be adding some kind of lightweight > 'generate headers' target for the kernel build so external projects > don't need to reinvent the wheel? Or maybe arla is just a very strange > one. Yeah, glancing at the kernel build itself, there's bold symlink just like what I did; lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25 Jan 25 18:43 machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include It would be nice if either the kernel sources would have /usr/src/sys/i386/machine or /usr/src/sys/i386/include/machine instead of ending in include *or* as you suggest a make-kernel-headers in the kernel itself would be nice and it could do the symlinking, vnode_if.awk'ing, etc. for people. But if this works for you, and Robert doesn't object, let's go with it. Robert, any thoughts? And do you want me to take a whack at merging nnpfs into the kernel build this weekend? I'd be jumping right into the deep end, but that's how you learn to swim, right? -- Alec Kloss alec@... IM: angryspamhater@... PGP key at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA241980E "No Bunny!" -- Simon, from Frisky Dingo |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |