Hello Sandro,
> Does not work for me so far :(.
Could you provide more information on what exactly doesn't work?
> Does it only work with a new version from SVNKit? Unfortunately I have to
> use the very old version 1.0 :(! But, if this can fix my problem I
will try
> to update SVNKit. Are the new versions compatible to all 1.0 functions?
Newer versions of SVNKit are not binary compatible with 1.0 version of
it, but in general you'll have to do not a lot of changes to the
existing code you have - and we'll be glad to help you with the transition.
Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://svnkit.com/ - Java [Sub]Versioning Library!
Sandro F wrote:
> Does not work for me so far :(.
>
> Does it only work with a new version from SVNKit? Unfortunately I have to
> use the very old version 1.0 :(! But, if this can fix my problem I will try
> to update SVNKit. Are the new versions compatible to all 1.0 functions?
>
> Regards,
> Sandro
>
>
>
>
>
> Alexander Kitaev-3 wrote:
>> Hello Sandro,
>>
>> Using low-level API (SVNRepository) and in particular
>> SVNRepository.status method with custom ISVNEditor implementation would
>> let you get the whole repository tree faster, comparing to doList(...)
>> call.
>>
>> See
>>
https://wiki.svnkit.com/Recursively%20fetching%20properties%20from%20a%20repository%20(low-level%20API)
>> for details. Article tells about fetching properties, but as you'll see
>> repository tree is received at the same time.
>>
>> Alexander Kitaev,
>> TMate Software,
>>
http://svnkit.com/ - Java [Sub]Versioning Library!
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
svnkit-users-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
svnkit-users-help@...
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
svnkit-users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
svnkit-users-help@...
