Re: Pet Ranged Attacks in a Future Version of SLASH'EM?

> On 01/05/2008 07:32:16 PM, xkernigh@...
> wrote:
>
> > The slashem pet patch would then join the slashem
> biodiversity patch  
> > (from slashem-devel October 2007) and the
> SLASHEM_PHLEGETHON branch  
> > in CVS. We should play-test and develop all this
> code until we are  
> > ready to merge it into the CVS main trunk. (The
> trunk contains the  
> > latest bug fixes and user-interface changes.)
> Eventually, a  
> > development release from trunk would include the
> slashem pet patch.
>
> Just to be clear for those of us who don't quite
> follow the above: CVS  
> trunk contains the current development version (ie.,
> 0.0.8 at present).  
> The phlegethon branch is an experimental branch that
> may be merged into  
> trunk once I finish it and propose it on
> slashem-devel. It would be  
> possible to create an experimental branch for the
> pet patch if it  
> needed some work before being proposed (Kernigh's
> play testing), but it  
> sounds like it could be proposed on slashem-devel
> pretty much as soon  
> as somebody spent the time porting it to the current
> development  
> version (or CVS head). The point of an experimental
> branch is so that  
> we can get a proposal to a suitable state before
> proposing it. Bugs  
> that don't get in the way of deciding whether we
> should merge or not  
> can simply be fixed after merging with CVS trunk.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ali.
>
>