WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days.
If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration
on the Nabble Support forum.
Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.
> yes, the text you quote on IETF Review is acceptable to me. I am basically looking for a process that will allow members of this WG to opine on:
> - Whether the spec is technically sound, interoperable etc.
> - Whether the spec is secure.
> - Whether it is appropriate to add it to IKEv1 (i.e. the spec would not damage adoption of IKEv2 and would not create future issues around migration to IKEv2).
> These goals are provided by the IETF Review process as defined in 5226, but not by the "lower" criteria.
I still find this to be too heavy-weight for my tastes, but I may be the only one who thinks so.