On Dec 4, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Ferdinando Ametrano wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 11:00 AM, Luigi Ballabio <
luigi.ballabio@...>
> wrote:
>> I don't think we'll add VC9 support to this release---it
>> wouldn't be testable anyway until Boost supports it too.
>
> Boost might be not a real issue: the binaries for VC9 are not
> downloadable, but if you use the new bjam 3.1.16
> (
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?
> group_id=7586&package_id=72941)
> it compile all boost 1.34.1 libraries despite endless reports about
> "unsupported compiler".
>
> So I went ahead and I've just committed project/solution files for
> VC9, and few tweaks to the autolink.hpp files and everything does
> compile but tracing.cpp as reported by Georgy:
I'm all in favor of adding support for VC9 (I've installed it too) but
might we do it on the trunk instead? The purpose of the release branch
should be to consolidate things, not to add new stuff at the last
minute. I appreciate the enthusiasm and the effort (and I hate to rain
on one's parade, especially since I'm doing it for the second time in a
week already) but we drew a line when we created the branch.
Luigi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
QuantLib-dev@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
