On Dec 5, 2007 10:57 AM, Luigi Ballabio <
luigi.ballabio@...> wrote:
> How about this: we keep VC9 out of 0.9.0, we wait for the next Boost
> release (this month or the next, from what I read on their mailing list)
> and we release 0.9.1 in January which adds VC9 support to 0.9.0. In the
> meantime, we fix the compilation issues on the trunk.
it's ok for me, especially if "keep VC9 out of 0.9.0" would just mean
we don't distribute the project files, without reverting the commit on
the R000900-branch. When the new boost is released we might want to
fix the compilation issues on the R000900-branch.
> b) headaches when people see the VC9 projects, rightfully expect it to
> be supported out of the box, find out instead that they have to patch
> Boost, and come back for help on the mailing list.
I agree you have a point here
ciao -- Nando
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4_______________________________________________
QuantLib-dev mailing list
QuantLib-dev@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/quantlib-dev
