WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days.
If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration
on the Nabble Support forum.
Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.
> If we are going to talk about "privacy by design", if we're going to discuss whether "SPDY's use of SSL offers a promise of improved privacy on the web", if we're going to do anything at all about privacy,
> we need to come to an agreement on what we mean by "privacy", since it was clear to me during previous discussions that TAG members had very different ideas about what the word meant.
> And yes, I think it needs separate agenda time to agree that this is the vocabulary we want to use, and if not, which one.
I'm certainly glad to give this agenda time either way, but I'm curious as
to whether you see the above as being within the scope of , and if not,
what you know about how you'd like to organize TAG work on privacy beyond
what's called for in .
In any case, I will at least tentatively plan to put a telcon session on
privacy and, if appropriate  in particular, on our telcon agenda for 24
May. If there are proposals for privacy work beyond APIs, that's fine too,
but I would like to take a look at why our other recent work on privacy had
to be abandoned after significant effort, and why things are likely to go
better if we re-engage.