On 09/05/2008, at 16.37, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 11:27 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
>>> - Make sure giop_thread_free() is not called on threads associated
>>> with connections for which timeouts are outstanding. Is this
>>> feasible?
>>> It sounds kinda like a clean and obvious solution, but I don't
>>> really
>>> understand the code that well...
>>>
>>> Jules, do you have any ideas? Have you ever seen this happen?
>>
>> I've never seen this happen before. I would agree that your proposal
>> number 3 is the way to go, but I can not clearly see how to implement
>> it. Michael?
>
> Really, it's not that clear to me how we are doing a thread_free and
> the continuing to wait for a timeout in that thread ;-)
>
> Are we correctly de-registering the timeout after we finish waiting ?
I certainly think we are. I may have made an error but I was careful
to ref/unref whenever appropriate.
BR,
jules
>
> or does the timeout get triggered in the IO thread or something ? :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
>
michael.meeks@... <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>
>
_______________________________________________
orbit-list mailing list
orbit-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
