Re: Problems in Chaotic, in my opinion

I see your point Takinom289, and as I always thought it'd be good for the energy to stay the way it is I agree with that point. I also agree about the elements because sometimes it would just look right, for example Tartarek, why doesn't he have the water element? It would seem that if a lobster gets the element so should a turtle. But then again, I don't think every creature should have an element, someone like H'earring doesn't seem to suit any element.

The main reason I like the Energy thing is that the unplayable creatures may actually be played. Honestly, why would a player use Laarina or Deenha when they can use Tangath Toborn or Maxxor? Unless there is some sort of Build limit to decks then there would be no point in using the weaker creatures, especially those who can't cast the main elemental attacks of the deck. For example, Pocketkoi (not specifically you, just an example deck that you may have made), you said that you didn't get any fire cards for your Magmon for five turns, that must mean that you were using either a second element or attacks without elements so that your elementless creatures could attack. If you didn't have any of the non-fire attacks (besides the ones you need to fill your attack deck) you would've had a much easier time getting the attacks you actually needed.

Simple solution to not liking the elementless creatures, don't use them and just use creatures with the elements that you like.