Hi
Thinking about this, shaded-impl in 2.1.x branch (current trunk)
should have the same group id.
Leonardo Uribe
2011/7/7 Jan-Kees van Andel <
jankeesvanandel@...>:
> +1 Good idea!
>
> /JK
>
> Op 7 jul. 2011 19:42 schreef "Gerhard Petracek" <
gerhard.petracek@...>
> het volgende:
>> +1
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>>
http://www.irian.at>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/7/7 Leonardo Uribe <
lu4242@...>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> +1, sounds good. Since it is an internal module that shouldn't and
>>> can't be used in a independent way, change its group-id is not a
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>> 2011/7/7 Jakob Korherr <
jakob.korherr@...>:
>>> > Hi guys,
>>> >
>>> > About a year ago we introduced the myfaces-impl-ee6 module, which
>>> > includes the servlet 3.0 related stuff for myfaces-impl. This means
>>> > the module is only needed for development reasons and will be shaded
>>> > into myfaces-impl anyway.
>>> >
>>> > However, I noticed that some developers who are not that familiar with
>>> > MyFaces core don't know what to do with myfaces-impl-ee6. Some even
>>> > think this is the replacement of myfaces-impl when using java ee 6,
>>> > which is - of course - complete nonsense.
>>> >
>>> > Thus I would like to propose to change the groupId of myfaces-impl-ee6
>>> > from org.apache.myfaces.core to org.apache.myfaces.core.internal. IMO
>>> > this makes it a lot more clear that this module is for internal
>>> > purposes only!
>>> >
>>> > Any objections, better ideas?
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Jakob
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jakob Korherr
>>> >
>>> > blog:
http://www.jakobk.com>>> > twitter:
http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr>>> > work:
http://www.irian.at>>> >
>>>
>