« Return to Thread: Query regarding custom workflow
Re: Query regarding custom workflow
by Imran M Yousuf-4
::
Rate this Message:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Heather Tinkham
<heather.tinkham@...> wrote:
> If I understand what you are asking, it looks like your problem is in the
> last line of your table, where you allow the Default user to change the
> status from Closed to Open.
Ah, actually its my mistake that I did not explain it properly, so I
am trying it again. What you have point out is perfectly ok. Now lets
suppose that there is a user called "some_user" who has 2 roles
"DEFAULT" & "TEST". Now there are 2 issues -
1. When I try to assign a issue to a user I can see "some_user" twice,
I assume that its because of their roles but the assigned list does
not show the roles so its practically impossible to know which
"some_user" represents which role.
2. As a result of (1) when "some_user" selects next state to be
"Closed" it still shows the fields as specified for "Open" for the
default user; but if user "test" whose role is "TEST" logs in he can
see the "Closed" fields as specified.
What I actually want to achieve is if "some_user" selects next state
to be "Closed" the fields displayed should be that of "Closed" and not
of "Open" and vice versa when "Open" is selected.
BTW, I am sorry for the inconvenience in the image in the last line, I
was actually focusing of state change from Open to Closed by user who
has both TEST and DEFAULT role.
Thank you,
Imran
>
> Your field level permission is set to M (Mandatory) for the Fix Version
> field. If you want them to be able to change it, but not be required to, it
> should be O (Optional).
>
> If you don't want it changed at all when going from Closed to Open, it
> should be R (Read only).
>
> This says that your Tester is not allowed to change the status once it is
> Closed. Is that what you want?
>
> Hope this helps-
> Heather
>
> Heather E.C. Tinkham
> Senior IT Consultant
> Object Partners, Inc.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Imran M Yousuf
> <imyousuf@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a user of JTrac and I seem to like it :), but I am stuck with a
>> workflow situation and am wondering how to go about solving it. I have
>> added the work-flow in he attachment. Now when designing this
>> work-flow what I had in mind is that, when state is changed from Open
>> to Closed, the Fix Version have to be mentioned. But what I can see in
>> practice is - Once the state is in closed if then I want to change the
>> state it asks me to mention the Fix Version; its exactly the opposite
>> to what I wanted :(. Can some please suggest me how I can achieve what
>> I want achieve?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> Imran M Yousuf
>> Entrepreneur & Software Engineer
>> Smart IT Engineering
>> Dhaka, Bangladesh
>> Email: imran@...
>> Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/
>> Mobile: +880-1711402557
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
>> around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
>> $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
>> 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
>> Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
>> _______________________________________________
>> j-trac-users mailing list
>> j-trac-users@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
> around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
> $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
> 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
> Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
> _______________________________________________
> j-trac-users mailing list
> j-trac-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>
>
--
Imran M Yousuf
Entrepreneur & Software Engineer
Smart IT Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Email: imran@...
Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/
Mobile: +880-1711402557
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
<heather.tinkham@...> wrote:
> If I understand what you are asking, it looks like your problem is in the
> last line of your table, where you allow the Default user to change the
> status from Closed to Open.
Ah, actually its my mistake that I did not explain it properly, so I
am trying it again. What you have point out is perfectly ok. Now lets
suppose that there is a user called "some_user" who has 2 roles
"DEFAULT" & "TEST". Now there are 2 issues -
1. When I try to assign a issue to a user I can see "some_user" twice,
I assume that its because of their roles but the assigned list does
not show the roles so its practically impossible to know which
"some_user" represents which role.
2. As a result of (1) when "some_user" selects next state to be
"Closed" it still shows the fields as specified for "Open" for the
default user; but if user "test" whose role is "TEST" logs in he can
see the "Closed" fields as specified.
What I actually want to achieve is if "some_user" selects next state
to be "Closed" the fields displayed should be that of "Closed" and not
of "Open" and vice versa when "Open" is selected.
BTW, I am sorry for the inconvenience in the image in the last line, I
was actually focusing of state change from Open to Closed by user who
has both TEST and DEFAULT role.
Thank you,
Imran
>
> Your field level permission is set to M (Mandatory) for the Fix Version
> field. If you want them to be able to change it, but not be required to, it
> should be O (Optional).
>
> If you don't want it changed at all when going from Closed to Open, it
> should be R (Read only).
>
> This says that your Tester is not allowed to change the status once it is
> Closed. Is that what you want?
>
> Hope this helps-
> Heather
>
> Heather E.C. Tinkham
> Senior IT Consultant
> Object Partners, Inc.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Imran M Yousuf
> <imyousuf@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a user of JTrac and I seem to like it :), but I am stuck with a
>> workflow situation and am wondering how to go about solving it. I have
>> added the work-flow in he attachment. Now when designing this
>> work-flow what I had in mind is that, when state is changed from Open
>> to Closed, the Fix Version have to be mentioned. But what I can see in
>> practice is - Once the state is in closed if then I want to change the
>> state it asks me to mention the Fix Version; its exactly the opposite
>> to what I wanted :(. Can some please suggest me how I can achieve what
>> I want achieve?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> Imran M Yousuf
>> Entrepreneur & Software Engineer
>> Smart IT Engineering
>> Dhaka, Bangladesh
>> Email: imran@...
>> Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/
>> Mobile: +880-1711402557
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
>> around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
>> $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
>> 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
>> Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
>> _______________________________________________
>> j-trac-users mailing list
>> j-trac-users@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
> around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
> $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
> 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
> Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
> _______________________________________________
> j-trac-users mailing list
> j-trac-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>
>
--
Imran M Yousuf
Entrepreneur & Software Engineer
Smart IT Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Email: imran@...
Blog: http://imyousuf-tech.blogs.smartitengineering.com/
Mobile: +880-1711402557
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
« Return to Thread: Query regarding custom workflow
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
