|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Question about symbols & API/ABI compatabilityOn 03/28/2009 05:21 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello, > > Thanks for the help, I got another question: are there any symbols in > the file I sent you last time, that are *NOT* missing (or are added by > 0.19.x) yet they are actually internal detail ? Can you send me a listing of all the symbols you are seeing in 0.19.x? behdad _______________________________________________ fribidi mailing list fribidi@... http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fribidi |
|
|
Re: Question about symbols & API/ABI compatabilityOn Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:59:31PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 03/28/2009 05:21 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for the help, I got another question: are there any symbols in >> the file I sent you last time, that are *NOT* missing (or are added by >> 0.19.x) yet they are actually internal detail ? > > Can you send me a listing of all the symbols you are seeing in 0.19.x? ---end quoted text--- New symbols in 0.19.x: fribidi_debug_status@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_bidi_type@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_bidi_type_name@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_bidi_types@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_joining_type@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_joining_type_name@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_joining_types@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_par_direction@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_get_par_embedding_levels@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_join_arabic@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_reorder_line@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_shape@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_shape_arabic@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_shape_mirroring@Base 0.19.1 fribidi_unicode_version@Base 0.19.1 Symbols that still exist from 0.10.9: fribidi_cap_rtl_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_char_set_desc@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_char_set_desc_cap_rtl@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_char_set_name@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_char_set_title@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_charset_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_cp1255_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_cp1256_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_get_mirror_char@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_get_type@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_get_type_internal@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_iso8859_6_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_iso8859_8_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_log2vis@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_log2vis_get_embedding_levels@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_mirroring_status@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_parse_charset@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_remove_bidi_marks@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_reorder_nsm_status@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_set_debug@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_set_mirroring@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_set_reorder_nsm@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_cap_rtl@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_charset@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_cp1255_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_cp1256_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_iso8859_6_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_iso8859_8_c@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_unicode_to_utf8@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_utf8_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 fribidi_version_info@Base 0.10.9 -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0x9DCA0B27 (@ subkeys.pgp.net) GPG Fingerprint: 087D 3767 8CAC 65B1 8F6C 156E D325 C3C8 9DCA 0B27 _______________________________________________ fribidi mailing list fribidi@... http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fribidi |
|
|
Re: Question about symbols & API/ABI compatabilityOn 03/29/2009 11:43 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:59:31PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: >> On 03/28/2009 05:21 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Thanks for the help, I got another question: are there any symbols in >>> the file I sent you last time, that are *NOT* missing (or are added by >>> 0.19.x) yet they are actually internal detail ? >> Can you send me a listing of all the symbols you are seeing in 0.19.x? > ---end quoted text--- > > New symbols in 0.19.x: > fribidi_debug_status@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_bidi_type@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_bidi_type_name@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_bidi_types@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_joining_type@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_joining_type_name@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_joining_types@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_par_direction@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_get_par_embedding_levels@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_join_arabic@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_reorder_line@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_shape@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_shape_arabic@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_shape_mirroring@Base 0.19.1 > fribidi_unicode_version@Base 0.19.1 These look good. > Symbols that still exist from 0.10.9: > fribidi_cap_rtl_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_char_set_desc_cap_rtl@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_cp1255_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_cp1256_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_get_type_internal@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_iso8859_6_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_iso8859_8_to_unicode_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_cap_rtl@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_charset@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_cp1255_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_cp1256_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_iso8859_6_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_iso8859_8_c@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_unicode_to_utf8@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_utf8_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 These are all internal symbols. The headers for these are not installed. When I was writing this code (~2003) I didn't know much about symbol hiding, etc. Do people think I should go ahead and hide them now? An alternative would be to just leave them there as I don't see them changing. behdad > fribidi_char_set_desc@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_char_set_name@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_char_set_title@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_charset_to_unicode@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_get_mirror_char@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_get_type@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_log2vis@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_log2vis_get_embedding_levels@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_mirroring_status@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_parse_charset@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_remove_bidi_marks@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_reorder_nsm_status@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_set_debug@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_set_mirroring@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_set_reorder_nsm@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi_version_info@Base 0.10.9 > fribidi mailing list fribidi@... http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fribidi |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |