Re: Question on lazy val

by Nils Kilden-Pedersen :: Rate this Message:

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Nils Kilden-Pedersen <nilskp@...> wrote:

That bug seems to address two completely different cases. I assume you mean case 2?

Sorry, I now see how it relates to both cases. So you would store f inside the Lazy instance and null it once evaluated, right?