Re: Questioning "James" stability as a sakai subsystem for email messaging process.

View: New views
1 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Parent Message unknown Re: Questioning "James" stability as a sakai subsystem for email messaging process.

by Casey Dunn :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Julian M. Morley wrote:

> Ron Peterson wrote:
>> 2007-09-12_11:54:00-0400 "Goodyear, Duran" <DGoodyear@...>:
>>
>>> He additionally would like to know if anyone has used PostFix
>>> instead of
>>> Sendmail, and if there is any documentation for that.
>>
>> I'm using Postfix here at Mount Holyoke College.  I don't have any real
>> documentation, but I could share my configuration with you if that
>> helps.
>
> I'd certainly be interested in seeing that.
>
>>> And, if Postfix could replace Sendmail AND James.
>>
>> I can't picture how that would work, but I've discovered holes in my
>> brain before.
>>
>
> Yeah, I can't see how that'd work either. At some point the mail needs
> to get into and out of Sakai, which requires some kind of Java mail
> interface.
>
Julian didn't mention that we get many complaints from our clients about
Sakai email problems.

They range across the symptoms already mentioned in this discussion.

It's one of the major issues with our Stanford deployment.


----------------------
This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab (https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal) from the DG: Development (a.k.a. sakai-dev) site.
You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace > Preferences.