Well,
planet.code4lib.org is less of a library planet than a "library
developer" planet. A library planet would be have way too many
feeds.
It has atom an atom feed:
http://code4lib.org/planet/atom.xml
Is that what you mean?
Still, although that's an incredibly good resource for information, it's not a terribly good resource for code.
I think there's some desire to make
http://www.code4lib.org/ serve that sort of purpose, but I can't remember, for sure.
Actually, you might want to check out the whole code4lib
community. It's pretty active, we're just not good at compiling
things :)
-Ross.
On 4/28/06, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck@...> wrote:
On 4/28/06, Ross Singer <ross.singer@...> wrote:
> Then again, nobody may contribute to it and it will wither on the vine,
> like so many other initiatives in the past.
Hmm. I started to write that there needs to be a library planet, but
I guess this is it:
http://planet.code4lib.org/
I didn't know about it until searching just now. :)
Who do I need to bug to get atom support over there?
...
I often wonder what it would be like for the patron model to return,
allowing people to spend their time doing things they are interested
in most of the time, rather than when their lives allow them a few
minutes' work.
_______________________________________________
Libx mailing list
Libx@...
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/libx
