« Return to Thread: RC tomorrow
Re: RC tomorrow
by Josh Parmenter
::
Rate this Message:
I am of the opinion that you only do an RC if you really mean RC. So,
I don't think we should plan on another one until it becomes obvious
one is necessary.
It won't be until tonight that I could actually get to building
anyways as my day has been as swamped as my last night.
How about this:
3.3 with Crucial
3.4 work could be towards efficiency and leaning things up over the
next few months, and working on the UGens -> Quarks idea?
OR - make the move, and we wait a day to test things. The 'bugfix' for
this, BTW, is as simple as 'install the Quark', so I don't think it
would be too bad. James - could you just make the new crucial Quark a
dependency in your Quarks?
I'm fine either way.
Josh
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:32 PM, felix <felix@...>
> wrote:
>> its been on my to do list for a long time
>> but I'm swamped with stuff
>> ideally I would break it up into crucial which is the bare basics
>> and crucial-extras which is mostly archaic
>> I'll try to look at it.
>> I think there are some methods in main that use crucial extensions
>
> Hmm... non-trivial chance of breakage... right before RC... maybe it's
> a bit late in the day for this. (This is RC, not beta... but then,
> releasing beta-quality software is standard practice in the industry!)
>
> I don't mean to stand in the way of this, just saying, pulling out a
> chunk of classes at the last minute without time for testing...
> "measure twice, cut once." If we're sure there's enough time to
> measure twice, OK. If we're not sure, maybe it would be better to hold
> off. (Will there be another RC?)
>
> hjh
>
>
> --
> James Harkins /// dewdrop world
> jamshark70@...
> http://www.dewdrop-world.net
>
> "Come said the Muse,
> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively
or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this
regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual
renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social
palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
I don't think we should plan on another one until it becomes obvious
one is necessary.
It won't be until tonight that I could actually get to building
anyways as my day has been as swamped as my last night.
How about this:
3.3 with Crucial
3.4 work could be towards efficiency and leaning things up over the
next few months, and working on the UGens -> Quarks idea?
OR - make the move, and we wait a day to test things. The 'bugfix' for
this, BTW, is as simple as 'install the Quark', so I don't think it
would be too bad. James - could you just make the new crucial Quark a
dependency in your Quarks?
I'm fine either way.
Josh
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:42 AM, James Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:32 PM, felix <felix@...>
> wrote:
>> its been on my to do list for a long time
>> but I'm swamped with stuff
>> ideally I would break it up into crucial which is the bare basics
>> and crucial-extras which is mostly archaic
>> I'll try to look at it.
>> I think there are some methods in main that use crucial extensions
>
> Hmm... non-trivial chance of breakage... right before RC... maybe it's
> a bit late in the day for this. (This is RC, not beta... but then,
> releasing beta-quality software is standard practice in the industry!)
>
> I don't mean to stand in the way of this, just saying, pulling out a
> chunk of classes at the last minute without time for testing...
> "measure twice, cut once." If we're sure there's enough time to
> measure twice, OK. If we're not sure, maybe it would be better to hold
> off. (Will there be another RC?)
>
> hjh
>
>
> --
> James Harkins /// dewdrop world
> jamshark70@...
> http://www.dewdrop-world.net
>
> "Come said the Muse,
> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively
or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this
regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual
renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social
palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
« Return to Thread: RC tomorrow
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
