WARNING: This server is unstable and will be retired in the next days. If you want to keep this forum available, please request immediately a migration on the Nabble Support forum. Forums that don't receive any migration request will be deleted forever.

« Return to Thread: RFC5201-bis status

Re: RFC5201-bis status

by Henderson, Thomas R :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

> >>> > #35 Limiting ECC to co-factor of 1
> >> Bob has proposed text
> here:http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/35
> >>
> >> Are there any comments or should we adopt the proposed text and
> close this issue?
> >
> > I am not an expert on the topic, but proposals seem fine to me.
>
> About issue 33:
> As there were no opposing opinions and TLS also handles the same
> problem in the proposed way, I will add the text proposed in the issue
> tracker to the current working document.
>

This is fine with me; any thoughts on taking the same step with issue 35, since it has drawn no comments?

- Tom
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

« Return to Thread: RFC5201-bis status