On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> g9ks157k:
> > Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 07:09 schrieb Ben Lippmeier:
> > > Hi All,
> > > I'm pleased to announce the initial alpha release
> > > of the Disciplined Disciple Compiler (DDC).
> > >
> > > Disciple is an explicitly lazy dialect of Haskell which includes:
> > > - first class destructive update of arbitrary data.
> > > - computational effects without the need for state monads.
> > > - type directed field projections.
> > >
> > > All this and more through the magic of effect typing.
> > >
> > > More information (and download!) available from:
> > >
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/DDC> > > or
http://code.google.com/p/disciple> > >
> > > DDC: more than lambdas.
> > >
> > > Onward!
> > > Ben.
> >
> > Short question: Is it appropriate to put the homepage of a non-Haskell project
> > on the Haskell Wiki? I mean, putting some basic info about such a project
> > there and link to the project’s website might be okay and is already done in
> > certain cases. But projects like Agda or Epigram typically don’t use
> > haskell.org as a webspace provider and I think this is the way to go. What
> > do others think?
>
> While YHC, lambdabot and xmonad do :) So I think the precedent has been
> that anything written in Haskell, or any Haskell-like compiler, can be
> happily hosted.
My experience has been that the Haskell community is and has been very
supportive of such projects, and most Haskellers would be more than
happy to have such a project on the Haskell Wiki.
Pugs started on the Haskell wiki.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
