Since the CD Lookup tool is dead and no longer developed and TRMs are on their way out, I don't think either of the related pages should be added. The rest however make perfect sense to me.
Cristov (wolfsong)
---
keschte@... wrote:
From: "Stefan Kestenholz" <
keschte@...>
To: "Discussions about the development of MusicBrainz for experienced users" <
musicbrainz-experts@...>
Subject: Re: [mb-experts] Re: [MusicBrainz Bug Tracker] #1281: Porting of static document: download.html
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:41:00 +0200
> Which pages do you need to be wikidocselt exactly? And most of all *how
> many* I suppose 20 new pages is ok, 50 might not. By new I mean pages
> which were not in the wiki a month ago.
The pages:
* Products
* PicardTagger
* PicardTaggerDownload
* ClassicTaggerDownload
* libmusicbrainz
* libmusicbrainzDownload
* libtunepimp
* libtunepimpDownload
* PythonMusicBrainz2
* PythonMusicBrainz2Download
* Server
* ServerDownload
* Database
* DatabaseDownload
* TRMGen
* CdLookupTool
* Development
* DevelopmentOverview
* Subversion
* Projects
* PicardDevelopment
* ServerDevelopment
* DatabaseDevelopment
the leaves of the documentation structure need not be made into
wikidocs pages currently, maybe never. additionally, the existing
physical structure of the old documentation can be used as a hint
which content should be made official:
http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/browser/mb_server/trunk/htdocs/developmenthttp://bugs.musicbrainz.org/browser/mb_server/trunk/htdocs/products--keschte
_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-experts mailing list
Musicbrainz-experts@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-experts_______________________________________________
Musicbrainz-experts mailing list
Musicbrainz-experts@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-experts
