« Return to Thread: DNSBL BCP v.2.0

Re: Re: DNSBL BCP v.2.0

by Matt Sergeant-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

On 14-Feb-07, at 2:59 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:

> No where within this entire draft is the role of the network  
> provider mentioned or properly considered.

Correct. That's as it should be. The creator of a DNSBL decides its  
listing criteria. The draft does not hope to mandate on listing  
criteria, and nor should it.

> The note Matt referenced pertains to condition continuing with  
> respect to a _specific_ IP address.

    Note that all listings being temporary does not mean that some
    listings will not remain after the initial timeout period. If the
    DNSBL administrator determines that the conditions for listing
    still exists, then the timer for determining timeouts MAY be
    renewed.

It seems to say "listing", not "IP address". I think you need reading  
glasses :~)

Matt.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

 « Return to Thread: DNSBL BCP v.2.0