Hi,
sorry for the late answer.
===
def readXml(isr: InputStreamResoure[InputStream]) = ...
===
Is too long (unnecessary complex).
===
def readXml(isr: InputStreamResource) = ...
===
is much easier to write.
I'm proposing to make InputStreamResource work only with InputStream,
not BufferedInputStream or any other InputStream.
Currenly InputStreamResource is:
===
abstract class InputStreamResource[+I <: InputStream] ...
===
I'd like to make it:
===
abstract class InputStreamResource ...
===
S.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 22:11, Jorge Ortiz <
jorge.ortiz@...> wrote:
> Also, what code do you find unnecessarily complex? Code in scalax or your
> own code?
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jorge Ortiz <
jorge.ortiz@...> wrote:
>>
>> Those types are passed on to ManagedResource which uses them in a fair
>> number of methods.
>>
>> I guess I'm not sure exactly what your proposing. Make a patch and e-mail
>> it to the list before committing any major changes?
>>
>> --j
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Stepan Koltsov <
yozh@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, nobody against, I'll it :)
>>>
>>> S.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:51, Stepan Koltsov <
yozh@...> wrote:
>>> > Hi, all.
>>> >
>>> > I'd like to make InputStreamResource and friends parameterless (i. e.
>>> > WriterResource will work only with Writer).
>>> >
>>> > I find parametrization useless, and code using this class unnecessary
>>> > complex.
>>> >
>>> > What do you think?
