« Return to Thread: building csound into Chrome OS
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: building csound into Chrome OS
by Michael Gogins-2
::
Rate this Message:
I have an Acer Aspire One, 1 GM RAM 160 GB HD, Atom processor. Runs
about 1/3 the speed of my Toshiba Qosmio, but is actually very useful,
I carry it around all the time and make Csound music on it.
My netbook uses the Eeebuntu distro of Ubuntu, which has a special
kernel built for netbooks. I installed it over Windows XP and
everything ran out of the box, including sound.
Regards,
Mike
On 7/9/09, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote:
> Actually I think I was being totally deluded here. I think Google's
> goal is to run an OS where everything goes through the browser and
> basically no applications can run locally. So you'd have to run csound
> on a server to make it work, but even then you couldn't necessarily
> hear the results.
>
> Ultimately 64Studio or Fedora is a better platform to build a "csound
> machine," a small laptop like an EEEPc or other netbook that's tuned
> to run csound "right out of the box" like the OLPC, with front end
> applications that allow a non coder to start making music right away,
> like a grown-up version of Tam Tam.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:21 PM, '2+<electriclightheads@...> wrote:
>> a bit too far ot but
>>
>> what about csound.js?
>> i once ran into somethang like this:
>> http://sk89q.therisenrealm.com/playground/jswav/
>> for a slow small thang
>> i think it's cute and the structure is simple
>> we don't even need a cloud nor a local-app to genarate a sound
>> just a browser
>>
>> actually
>> am gradually shifting myself to general language oriented
>> i mean algo-comp2wav directly by python (no csound)
>> just takin care of what i calc for each sample
>> i think i'll also work on osillator.hs
>> (which is just a design of algo-comped-value goin up'n'down)
>> and take adbantage of its stdout from various languages
>>
>> am not serious about js at this moment but
>> if js and html>5 and chrome-os is a way to go cheap 'n' minimal
>> maybe that's another alternative?
>>
>> btw
>> am interested in the rather minimal browser "uzbl"
>> i'd like uzbluntu running on arm-y mobile device
>> most of things via browser is nice
>> but no reason at all to get rid of taking advantage of apt
>>
>> --
>> SaRiGaMa's Oil Vending Orchestra
>> is podcasting:
>> http://sarigama.namaste.jp/podcast/rss.xml
>> and supplying oil.py for free:
>> http://oilpy.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
--
Michael Gogins
Irreducible Productions
http://www.michael-gogins.com
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com
Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound"
about 1/3 the speed of my Toshiba Qosmio, but is actually very useful,
I carry it around all the time and make Csound music on it.
My netbook uses the Eeebuntu distro of Ubuntu, which has a special
kernel built for netbooks. I installed it over Windows XP and
everything ran out of the box, including sound.
Regards,
Mike
On 7/9/09, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@...> wrote:
> Actually I think I was being totally deluded here. I think Google's
> goal is to run an OS where everything goes through the browser and
> basically no applications can run locally. So you'd have to run csound
> on a server to make it work, but even then you couldn't necessarily
> hear the results.
>
> Ultimately 64Studio or Fedora is a better platform to build a "csound
> machine," a small laptop like an EEEPc or other netbook that's tuned
> to run csound "right out of the box" like the OLPC, with front end
> applications that allow a non coder to start making music right away,
> like a grown-up version of Tam Tam.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:21 PM, '2+<electriclightheads@...> wrote:
>> a bit too far ot but
>>
>> what about csound.js?
>> i once ran into somethang like this:
>> http://sk89q.therisenrealm.com/playground/jswav/
>> for a slow small thang
>> i think it's cute and the structure is simple
>> we don't even need a cloud nor a local-app to genarate a sound
>> just a browser
>>
>> actually
>> am gradually shifting myself to general language oriented
>> i mean algo-comp2wav directly by python (no csound)
>> just takin care of what i calc for each sample
>> i think i'll also work on osillator.hs
>> (which is just a design of algo-comped-value goin up'n'down)
>> and take adbantage of its stdout from various languages
>>
>> am not serious about js at this moment but
>> if js and html>5 and chrome-os is a way to go cheap 'n' minimal
>> maybe that's another alternative?
>>
>> btw
>> am interested in the rather minimal browser "uzbl"
>> i'd like uzbluntu running on arm-y mobile device
>> most of things via browser is nice
>> but no reason at all to get rid of taking advantage of apt
>>
>> --
>> SaRiGaMa's Oil Vending Orchestra
>> is podcasting:
>> http://sarigama.namaste.jp/podcast/rss.xml
>> and supplying oil.py for free:
>> http://oilpy.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
--
Michael Gogins
Irreducible Productions
http://www.michael-gogins.com
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com
Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@... with body "unsubscribe csound"
« Return to Thread: building csound into Chrome OS
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
