On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:36:16PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Jeff Layton<
jlayton@...> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:42:43 -0500
> > For the record, I'm also disappointed that the commented out asn1
> > function got merged today too. I'd have preferred to see that go in
> > when it actually becomes useful (and usable).
>
> I understand your point. I thought the timing made sense because
a) unused code should never go in
b) patches should go out to a mailinglist and reviewed.
Can we please get these basic rules of linux development discipline
working again in cifs-land?
_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
linux-cifs-client@...
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
