On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Marcus Better<
marcus@...> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Fischer wrote:
>> Tomcat is probably the dominant deployment environment for Grails, an
>> argument can be made that making the dev and production environments
>> mirror each-other closely is important (search grails-user for Tomcat to
>> see hints at that).
>
> That does not sound too convicing to me, but so far it is the only reason
> that has been advanced for any possible benefit to Grails users of this
> switch.
>
>> I harbor a deep suspicion that this has something to do with it, too:
>>
http://www.springsource.com/products/tcserver>
> That is a natural conclusion from the information presented so far. The
> benefit to SpringSource is clear, but the benefit to Grails users is much
> less clear, as are the technical reasons for this change.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marcus
I don't think I see the downside. Grails developers will have the
option to choose which container they want to be used by commands like
run-app, a choice they haven't been able to make in the past. If
there are going to be choices, something needs to be the default and
since more of our users deploy to Tomcat than Jetty, Tomcat seems the
sensible default. For anyone who wants to continue using Jetty, they
will be able to do that. I don't think anyone is really giving
anything up but a lot of folks are getting something that they have
wanted.
This really should not present a problem for any projects.
jb
--
Jeff Brown
SpringSource
http://www.springsource.com/Autism Strikes 1 in 166
Find The Cause ~ Find The Cure
http://www.autismspeaks.org/---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email