Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Am 29.06.2009 um 14:11 schrieb Jean-Baptiste BRIAUD -- Novlog:
> About other lib, I was thinking about
http://code.google.com/p/google-gson/> Any feedback ?
Never used it, so I'm not able to comment.
> I didn't read anything about Date restriction in gson.
> I understand that qooxdoo Date serialization is special but all good
> implementation of JSON serializer allow for custom serialization/
> deserialization, so we could make qooxdoo Date serialization case
> optional.
Careful with that. Usually, custom (de)serialization is achieved via
additional attributes ("hints") in the transmitted JSON data. However,
the Date support in qooxdoo works via direct "new Date(...)"
expressions. I haven't looked at the Google lib you mentioned, but I
seriously doubt that this kind of syntax can be plugged in easily.
(Again, we might not want to keep the qooxdoo date support, but that's
a separate discussion, see bug #1400.)
Anyway, why are you so keen on replacing the low-level JSON lib on the
Java side? What's wrong with the one from json.org? I'd say "never
touch a running system" in this case, except there's something
seriously wrong or missing from the json.org version.
Regards,
Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
