Ah, I missed that.
Not surprising really, as it sure as hell isn't visible anywhere on
the site, nor has it received any sort of widespread announcement. :-)
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Jorge Ortiz <
jorge.ortiz@...> wrote:
> Jamie tagged a 0.1 release last week:
>
>
http://scala-tools.org/repo-releases/org/scalaforge/scalax/0.1/scalax-0.1.jar>
> --j
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:50 AM, David MacIver <
david.maciver@...> wrote:
>> What are the plans in terms of releasing a version of scalax at some
>> point, even if it's not considered to be a stable release? Its
>> perpetually unreleased state basically means we're constrained to only
>> depend on it in applications and can't use it in libraries (else you
>> run into serious versioning issues). This is a bit painful, as much of
>> scalax.io and similar stuff would be really useful to have as a
>> general toolkit.
>>
>> Additionally: Originally there seemed to be some talk of scalax
>> serving as a proving ground for merging stuff back into the Scala
>> standard libraries. This seems to have completely evaporated. Is it
>> still on the radar at all?
>>
>>
>
