« Return to Thread: RemoteActor based on NIO ?

Re: RemoteActor based on NIO ?

by Kevin Wright-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

My vote goes with JavaSpaces...


On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Landei <Daniel.Gronau@...> wrote:



kermitas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just looked at Scala RemoteActor sources and I saw that implementation
> is based on old fashion blocking IO.
> Sicne this way a little bit old and (what is more important!) it is NOT
> SCALABLE I wanted to ask if there are plans to make RemoteActors using NIO
> ?
>
> In simple scenario when we build client-server software based on
> RemoteActors we will kill machine after ~1000 connections. After reading
> "Scala - the next five years" if we want Scala to be the language of the
> future RemoteActors should be based on NIO !
>
> Thanks,
> Arthur.
>
>

I'm no expert, but I tend to agree. Maybe we could use existing
infrastructure for this, e.g. things like http://mina.apache.org/ ?

Cheers,
Daniel

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RemoteActor-based-on-NIO---tp24389820p24390172.html
Sent from the Scala - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 « Return to Thread: RemoteActor based on NIO ?