Re: Replacing TinyMCE with Xinha

Computer Guru wrote:
> I've always wondered why WP used TinyMCE as the WYSIWYG editor. It doesn't
> result in the best code, it's not 100% xhtml compatible, it's not _that_
> "tiny," and most importantly, there are better alternatives out there.

Write bugs.  They will be passed to Moxie for fixage.

> (Think of it this way: Way more people will switch to 2.1 when you tell them
> there's a new WYSIWYG engine that looks great, has tons of functions, and
> produces 100% valid XHTML!!! =P)

xinha does look pretty nice, but we're not doing an editor change for
2.1.  There's not enough time for that.

Ryan
_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers@...
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers