« Return to Thread: reviews of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01

Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01

by jouni korhonen :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

Hi,

On Feb 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for replying late.
>
> I compiled the revision of this document.
> This version hopefully captures the comments from two reviewers in dhcwg.
>
> You can find it here.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-02
>
> On 2011/12/02, at 1:29, jouni korhonen wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I promised to make a review of this I-D. My comments can be found here:
>> http://deadcoderssociety.net/6man.pdf
>>
>> There are two main things:
>> 1) I suggest to remove all text that references into the future regarding ongoing work etc. That will look a bit weird when actual RFCs come out etc.
>
> About this point, I see several RFCs that refer to internet drafts.
> Do we really need to remove all the refereces for i-ds ?

I mainly mean text formulation such in abstract that says:
   "While RFC 3484 is in the process of being updated, .."
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You still can have references to in progress work, no problem with that.

- Jouni



>
> Thanks !
>
>
>> 2) It is not clear what happens when DASP_OPTION is received from multiple sources and in all cases Section 4.2. "trust" requirements are met. Will the last received policy overwrite all previously learned?
>>
>> Also I did not quite get the "leak of privacy information". Could you elaborate that a bit further in the I-D. And finally, regarding the prefix encoding in the option I would myself prefer 1 octet granularity over 4.. or is there a specific reason for selecting 4? (DHCPv6 options do not have alignment requirements)
>>
>> - Jouni
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> at Quebec, Tim Chown presented about address selection documents
>>> discussed in 6man WG, and requested reviewers for the draft
>>> draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01.
>>> slides are http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/slides/dhc-13.pdf
>>>
>>> IIRC, one reviewer was chosen at that time, and the other was left
>>> undecided.
>>>
>>> So, my questions are
>>> the review was submitted somewhere ?
>>> the other reviewer was chosen ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Arifumi Matsumoto
>>> NGN System Architecture Project
>>> NTT Service Integration Laboratories
>>> E-mail: arifumi@...
>>> TEL +81-422-59-3334 FAX +81-422-59-6364
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dhcwg mailing list
>>> dhcwg@...
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> 松本 存史 <arifumi@...>
> NTTサービスインテグレーション基盤研究所
> 次世代ネットワーク方式SEプロジェクト
>  ネットワークアーキテクチャグループ
>  TEL 0422-59-3334  FAX 0422-59-6364
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

 « Return to Thread: reviews of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01