Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01

> Hi,
>
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sorry for replying late.
>>
>> I compiled the revision of this document.
>> This version hopefully captures the comments from two reviewers in dhcwg.
>>
>> You can find it here.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-02
>>
>> On 2011/12/02, at 1:29, jouni korhonen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I promised to make a review of this I-D. My comments can be found here:
>>> http://deadcoderssociety.net/6man.pdf
>>>
>>> There are two main things:
>>> 1) I suggest to remove all text that references into the future regarding ongoing work etc. That will look a bit weird when actual RFCs come out etc.
>>
>> About this point, I see several RFCs that refer to internet drafts.
>> Do we really need to remove all the refereces for i-ds ?
>
> I mainly mean text formulation such in abstract that says:
>   "While RFC 3484 is in the process of being updated, .."
>                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> You still can have references to in progress work, no problem with that.
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>
>>> 2) It is not clear what happens when DASP_OPTION is received from multiple sources and in all cases Section 4.2. "trust" requirements are met. Will the last received policy overwrite all previously learned?
>>>
>>> Also I did not quite get the "leak of privacy information". Could you elaborate that a bit further in the I-D. And finally, regarding the prefix encoding in the option I would myself prefer 1 octet granularity over 4.. or is there a specific reason for selecting 4? (DHCPv6 options do not have alignment requirements)
>>>
>>> - Jouni
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> at Quebec, Tim Chown presented about address selection documents
>>>> discussed in 6man WG, and requested reviewers for the draft
>>>> draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-01.
>>>> slides are http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/81/slides/dhc-13.pdf
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, one reviewer was chosen at that time, and the other was left
>>>> undecided.
>>>>
>>>> So, my questions are
>>>> the review was submitted somewhere ?
>>>> the other reviewer was chosen ?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Arifumi Matsumoto
>>>> NGN System Architecture Project
>>>> NTT Service Integration Laboratories
>>>> E-mail: arifumi@...
>>>> TEL +81-422-59-3334 FAX +81-422-59-6364
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dhcwg mailing list
>>>> dhcwg@...
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 松本 存史 <arifumi@...>
>> NTTサービスインテグレーション基盤研究所
>> 次世代ネットワーク方式SEプロジェクト
>> ネットワークアーキテクチャグループ
>> TEL 0422-59-3334  FAX 0422-59-6364
>>
>
>