Re: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications

>
> I am not totally comfortable with this approach, since it feels to me
> as if we are asserting that the original order was incorrect. This
> would obviously be ok if we were indeed correcting an order which had
> never been actioned but for a valid, actioned order, this does not
> feel correct, since it essentially hides the original order, albeit
> that the original instruction is still available for medico-legal
> purposes via the original committed version.
>
> I think  would prefer to create a new order but link it to the
> original to ensure that the clinical requirement to maintain a chain
> of events is ensured"
>
> Any thoughts?
>