« Return to Thread: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications

Re: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications

by Thomas Beale-3 :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

On 10/12/2011 17:04, Eunice Ab wrote:
Hi Thomas and Seref

Many thanks for your response ... this was what I thought too .... but then does that not mean that all that is needed to be able to capture both under actions is an attribute of 'type' for 'intended' and 'actual' OR 'request' and 'response' rather than separating them to remove the confusion of thinking both are not actions.


no, because the information structure of an Instruction is in future time, so specifying it requires structures / data items that correspond to that. The model we use in openEHR is by no means the best, but it illustrates: in future time you specify what might possibly happen, including with conditional branches, as workflow engines do. Actions are in past time, and are therefore simpler to represent. On the other hand, Actions being performed usually represent transitions in a state machine. See the openEHR models of these two Entry types here.

- thomas


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@...
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical

 « Return to Thread: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications