« Return to Thread: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications

Re: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications

by sarikan :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_object



On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:36 PM, S JAGANNATHAN <sjagannathan@...> wrote:
If that is the case. then there really is no need for Instruction separately as such.
The 'what' can be specified and the context may be obtained by applying attributes such as for a procedure- proposed, done, not done, postponed, recommended, instructed(as well!) etc. and for drugs-prescribed, taken, dispensed etc.

Jag



--- On Sat, 10/12/11, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale@...> wrote:

From: Thomas Beale <thomas.beale@...>

Subject: Re: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications
To: openehr-clinical@...
Date: Saturday, 10 December, 2011, 17:15



In a trivial sense that is of course true. But the interesting part of an Instruction is what is being instructed, which is where the potential complexity lies.

- thomas

On 10/12/2011 17:02, S JAGANNATHAN wrote:
> When you instruct someone do to something then it is an action.
>
>
> Jag
>


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@...
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@...
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical

 « Return to Thread: Revision of Instructions - clinical implications