Re: Ruby 1.9 port

Caspar Florian Ebeling wrote:
> * Name: I tend to call it ruby19. Another option would be ruby-devel,
> but 1.9 is mildly incompatible,

I'd say more than mildly!  And 1.9.0, at least, is explicitly NOT
production-ready.  ruby19 sounds logical.

I don't know if there's a naming standard on macports, but "-dev" and
"-devel" package suffixes on both Red Hat- and Debian-based Linux
distros mean "the include files you'll need to compile against this
package/library".  So I'd recommend against -devel.

Jay Levitt
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@...
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev