« Return to Thread: Ruby and CruiseControl

Re: Ruby and CruiseControl

by Jeffrey Fredrick-2 :: Rate this Message:

I think that would make sense for a very limited audience.... Very
limited. Like just you. :)

For most people they're going to use the same ant build script outside
of CC so to have it inside of CC's config.xml isn't very desireable.
Then too you lose the advantage you get from editors that know how to
put together ant build files (IDEA and Eclipse come to mind). Finally
most build scripts are quite a bit more complicated and you wouldn't
want to have all that logic mixed in w/the CC configuration.

So I can see why it would be perfect for you but I'm afraid I don't
see it being very useful generally.

Jtf

On 7/4/06, Johan Nilsson <r.johan.nilsson@...> wrote:

>
> Maybe it's just me, but wouldn't it be nice to be able to define an 'inline'
> antbuilder task - e.g. contain ant <project> tags directly within the CC
> config.xml file?
>
> <schedule ...>
> <ant type="inline">
> <project ...>
> <exec .../>
> <xslt .../>
> </project>
> </ant>
> </schedule>
>
> As I said, I don't know ant (besides what I've just tested with the xslt
> task), so this might not make much sense.
>
> [snip rest]
>
> // Johan

--

http://www.developertesting.com/

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrol-user mailing list
Cruisecontrol-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cruisecontrol-user

« Return to Thread: Ruby and CruiseControl