On Oct 6, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
> the MSRP chat was reviewed in MMUSIC, and we got two main comments:
> 1) extensibility of the 'chatroom' attribute in SDP. Do we need an IANA registry
> 2) Privacy concerns of this attribute.
> The review is here:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg08940.html >
> For issue 1, I think that we don't need an IANA registry at this point, in particular because we are not expecting extensions to this attribute. My proposal is to simply indicate that organizations that want to extend this attribute and create new tokens should use their reversed names to avoid clashes among then.
Out of curiosity, if we don't expect extensions, do we need the extension point int he ABNF?
If an organization creates more than one extension token, is it up to that organization to coordinate them?
> For issue 2, I will think a bit what we need to say and I will post it in a separate mail once I have the text. I am willing to receive suggestions.
> Miguel A. Garcia
> Ericsson Spain
> Simple mailing list
> Simple@... > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple