Re: SPASM - a MPASM behave alike

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Peter Keller <psilord@...> wrote:

> What would the challenges be in writing a completely standalone
> preprocessor which just emits the processed assembly to be then fed
> into gpasm?
>

Why would write the #define / #include style preprocessor at all? This
should be done by existing tools like the cpp instead of reinventing the
wheel. The "other preprocessor" used by MPASM which is involved by the
equ/macro style could be written as a separated preprocessor which would
make the remaining compiler fairly trivial in my opinion.

Is there a linker implemented in this SPASM with the MPASM style linker
scripts?

Tamas
--
http://www.mcuhobby.com