On 20/04/12 11:35, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Lionel Cons wrote:
>> What about using something more flexible for logging (such as log4j)?
> Indeed. We all know we should do this. We have not done it. There are
> other features that fall in this category too.
Er, that error is logged in the bowels of the erlang ssl stack. Good
luck in filtering that out; you'd have to find a logging framework that
can filter based on a regexp match of the the log message. Or something