« Return to Thread: Facelets 1.2

Re: SV: Facelets 1.2

by Adam Brod-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread


I wouldn't recommend you adopt Facelets if you are looking for additional functionality.  The current version of Facelets is very good and stable.  That said, there are some open defects that aren't being addressed (you can browse the project issues to get a sense for the pace of bug fixes).  

The JSF 2.0 Expert Group is seriously considering incorporating something very similar to Facelets in JSF 2.0.  I presume that the developers of Facelets (primarily Jacob Hookum and Adam Winer) would be working on that specification and implementation.  Perhaps with Facelets as a starting point.

If you are considering JSF 2.0, then I would strongly, strongly recommend Facelets over JSP.  There are so many defects in the JSP/JSF integration that Facelets is 1000% better.  JSP 2.1 is supposedly much better, but still not as good as Facelets.  

I've been on this mailing list for a while now.  In general, there doesn't appear to be much active development of Facelets.  The dev team isn't super active on the mailing list anymore, but there is a very nice community of Facelets users that will help you out if you have questions.  

This is all my opinion and conjecture, but I hope it gives you some more information to help you make your decision.

Adam Brod

Product Development Team




From: "Zetterman Erik" <Erik.Zetterman@...>
To: <users@...>
Date: 05/29/2007 08:02 AM
Subject: SV:  Facelets 1.2




I totally agree.
We're evaluating the framework right now and the lack of information regarding the future is my major concern.


Från: mike.sauer@... [mailto:mike.sauer@...]
Skickat:
den 29 maj 2007 13:39
Till:
users@...
Ämne:
Facelets 1.2



For those of us evaluating facelets for recommendation for use in our organizations it is troubling that questions such as these regarding the status/roadmap of facelets go unanswered.  Can anyone please provide some reassurance and updates?


>On 5/22/07, Jason Suplizio <suplizio@...> wrote:
>

>I need to know that as well (even a ballpark). We're putting a timeline
>together for facelets adoption and this is very important to us.
>
>
>On 5/22/07, Ian Springer <ian.springer@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jacob,
>>
>> What new features are planned for Facelets 1.2 and is there an estimate
>> for when it will be released?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Ian


Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.

 « Return to Thread: Facelets 1.2