I think, what you mean are the commands T and S (or s and t) -
the expansion to Q and C is already mentioned in the specification.
It has to be done by the viewer.
This is straight forward. If you now it for Q -> C the problem is
solved, because the paths are already normalised from small to large
letters, T -> Q -> C and S -> C, therefore it is only the question,
why not L -> C...
Hi
Thanks for reply. Now, how to convert T -> Q and S -> C.
And what about the relatives path data, can that also be converted from t -> q and s -> c.
As I was doing T -> C which was giving wrong results.
If T -> Q is done then I think my problem would be solved as I have api's for C.
And now I know how to convert Q -> C.
Thanks
Nand Kumar.
