« Return to Thread: San Fransisco average temp

Re: San Fransisco average temp

by Mark J. Reed :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

The bug in day numbers is neither a Windows  API feature nor
Microsoft's fault; it was a bug in Lotus 1-2-3 that was introduced
into Excel for compatibility (bug-for-bug!) and has remained ever
since for the same reason.

Apple neatly sidestepped the leap year confusion (in their case it was
a system api feature) by starting with 1904 instead.

On 6/29/09, Irv Bromberg <irv.bromberg@...> wrote:

> Dear Mike and Calendarists:
>
> I have prepared an Excel spreadsheet showing the San Fransisco average
> temperature 1995 to end of 2008, based on U Dayton records.
>
> It is a ZIP file, so I can't email it to anybody because most email
> servers reject ZIP files, but you can download it from our file
> transfer server:
>
> https://filetransfer.mtsinai.on.ca/lft/Lft.html?id=757e7ecca69c9364343e3c027f9a44d3
>
> The file will be deleted automatically from the server in seven days.
>
> Try to use a version of Excel that is older than the Windows 2007
> version, because that latest version is extremely sluggish when
> working with this file, and even more profoundly so is the Macintosh
> 2008 version (Apple Numbers spreadsheet -- totally hopeless, spinning
> beach ball mouse cursor for hours, I complained to Apple.)  I suspect
> that the newer versions have "new" but very inefficient calendrical
> calculations in them, probably made highly inefficient because of
> extra overhead for handling all of the global date format variants.
>
> Within the Excel file are a few worksheets:
>
> The "Landscape" chart shows just 2 years, you can change the x-axis to
> choose other ranges.
>
> The "Long" chart shows all of the data as one long chart in portrait
> orientation, but don't try to print it -- impossible!  This is the
> worksheet that contain my sine-wave fits.  You can tweak the sine-wave
> fit coefficients over at the top right, sorry if their meaning may be
> obscure, this was not intended to be "user friendly", and I haven't
> worked out how to automatically calculate those coefficients.  It is
> impossible to obtain a perfect fit, because the same sine wave can't
> fit all of these years, and the peaks in September that Victor pointed
> out often occur are obviously going to be beyond the curve there, but
> anyhow overall the data is again consistent with a 35-day lag.
>
> The "Data" worksheet contains the raw data.  Degrees Celcius, so
> there.  The SF average annual temperature is about 13.9°C, and the
> average half-span, well moderated by the nearby Pacific, is only ±4°C.
>
> The "EqSolst" worksheet lists all of the equinox and solstices from
> 1995 to 2009.  The numbers are Windows date serial numbers (day #1 =
> December 31, 1899, don't believe it when Microsoft tells you
> otherwise, because Windows thinks that Feb 29 came after Feb 28,
> 1900), and the fraction is the fraction of day elapsed from midnight
> in terms of San Fransisco standard time.  You can format these to
> display date and time without adversely affecting the charts, but I
> didn't bother because normally there should be little interest in
> looking at this worksheet.  The Low and High cells are just to set the
> axis limits for the drawn lines that indicate the equinoxes and
> solstices.
>
>
> -- Irv Bromberg, Toronto, Canada
>
> <http://www.sym454.org/>

--
Sent from my mobile device

Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>

 « Return to Thread: San Fransisco average temp