« Return to Thread: Separate Fingerprint for elGamal-Subkey?

Re: Separate Fingerprint for elGamal-Subkey?

by Sven Radde-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi!

Pitigrilli schrieb:
> I thought that there is only one fingerprint and that this would be
> sufficient to confirm the integrity of the public key.
All your subkeys are signed by your primary key (see "gpg --list-sigs",
the lines with "sig" after each "sub" line).
Therefore, verifying the fingerprints of subkeys is not necessary (or
particularly sensible - IMHO) if the main fingerprint and its signatures
on the subkeys are OK.

cu, Sven

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@...
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

 « Return to Thread: Separate Fingerprint for elGamal-Subkey?