On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Gary VanMatre <
gvanmatre@...> wrote:
>
> I'd rather see the Shale community grow this library and the Shale project. However, if the communities feel that the only way we can find volunteers to contribute to its ongoing growth (seems a bit snobbish) is to move to MyFaces, then so be it.
+1. I'm not saying I'm dead set against a MyFaces merger. If that's
the best thing for the Shale project, then let's go do it. But I would
much rather see efforts to grow the Shale community, rather than take
one node that has a lot of interest and move it somewhere else. I
don't think we've really explored the options that involve keeping all
of Shale here.
As to Simon's argument that Shale Test is linked exclusively to JSF, I
think that applies to the whole framework. We can't work towards a JSF
2 version of the other components without having a JSF 2 codebase to
link to. So if Test is being held back by that dependency then so is
the rest of the project.
Greg
