Re: Shameless self-promotion but FYI

> Andy:
> "Late 20th Century" would have been a better choice and less subject to
> misinterpretation (and accusations of premature aging).
> Jack Klasey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-photoforum@...
> [mailto:owner-photoforum@...] On Behalf Of ADavidhazy
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:13 PM
> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> Subject: Re: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
>
> I was wondering about that ... does 1970 - 1999 count
> as being late 1900s or am I confused - age you know.
>
> and I REALLY would like to know ... did I make a
> grammatical or other snafu with this statement?
>
> help!
>
> andy
>
>
>
>
> wpettit@... wrote:
>
>> "It is intended to be record of the work produced by Andrew Davidhazy in
> the late 1900s."
>>
>> Gee Andy, We had no idea you were that old.....
>>
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>>>From: ADavidhazy <andpph@...>
>>>Sent: Jun 29, 2009 1:10 PM
>>>To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> <photoforum@...>
>>>Subject: Shameless self-promotion but FYI
>>>
>>>Published a vanity press, illustrated, Lulu book on the Phoenix Process.
>>>
>>>http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback-book/fleeting-phoenix-figures/399430
> 6
>>>
>>>Andy
>>>
>>
>>
>