Timie Milie wrote:
> I guess it might just come down to a matter of preference but while I
> don't want a DLL dependency on Crypto++ (so I use it as a static
> library) I don't wan't to use the runtime as a static library (as this
> can be found on most computers). If I am not unusual in the latter
> preferrence is it worth changing this default setting in the MVC
> project on subsequent releases (not doing so creates multiple (re)
> defined runtime function errors should anyone by wondering)?
You might want to reconsider this... VC6 was the last compiler that
would generate code using msvcrt.dll (for non-static builds).
There are actually 2 issues here - not only do the newer (starting with
VC7 in VS 2002) MS compilers not use the older runtime DLL, the newer
C/C++ runtime DLLs are no longer considered a part of Windows - so the
newer ones do not come along with Windows service packs.
And all of this is in addition to the weird problems that will
eventually crop up with (if I understood you correctly) trying to build
apps that use both the static and dynamic runtimes.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to
cryptopp-users-unsubscribe@....
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
http://www.cryptopp.com.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
