« Return to Thread: Should the edit system be viewable to the general public?

Re: Should the edit system be viewable to the general public?

by Pavan Chander :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

An "anonymous subscriber" is in fact a registered user, one who can log in and make edits. For reasons known to them they have decided not to disclose who they subscribe to.

This is very different from the "general public" access I'm talking about.

I'm asking whether someone who doesn't have an account should be able to view the edit system, and have access to the edit history.


Pavan Chander // navap


On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Martin Lesser <ml-musicbrainz@...> wrote:
Kuno Woudt <kuno@...> writes:

>> IMO this question is comparable to wikipedia where you can review
>> edits/history without being registered user.
> On wikipedia you can also edit without being a registered user.
> naturally, you can thus view other edits too.  It's not quite the
> same situation as musicbrainz.

But the question discussed here is whether the public (and not only
anonymous MB-subscribers) should be able to *view* edits done by
registered MB-users?

Please correct if I'm wrong.

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users


_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
MusicBrainz-users@...
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users

 « Return to Thread: Should the edit system be viewable to the general public?