Re: Should we officially kill the 0.22 ?

Tuju is right. IMHO we should really drop any support (if there would be
any ...) for 0.22. It's really frustrating for end users AND developers
that tickets for 0.22 will never get fixed. E.g. the guy from
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg01486.html 
wants to get http://opensync.org/ticket/877 fixed. This is a bug that
should be already solved with newer libsyncml and libwbxml I guess. But
what should we do with this ticket? Should I close it because it is
invalid? No, because it is a serious bug. Am I going to fix it for 0.22?
No, because I don't want to waste my time with 0.22 and move on with
0.40! The only solution is to declare 0.22 as dead and unsupported! Or
is anybody out there who is willing to step in?
If we decide to do this we need a post in the wiki which explains our
decision in detail.

I am not sure if 0.22 is unusable and should be dropped from distos too.
Never used that old version. Sometimes it works and sometimes not. That
decision is up to distro maintainers.

Btw. why people always claim about the opensync development and don't
get involved with the development??? There must be hundreds of users out
there and only a few people care about our project.

Regards
--
/Bjoern Ricks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Opensync-devel mailing list
Opensync-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-devel