Yeah, well, all that is fine, but that e-mail is not in my spam box.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Randall R Schulz
<rschulz@...> wrote:
On Monday July 6 2009, Florian Hars wrote:
> Daniel Sobral schrieb:
> > Well, I saw the quote, but I didn't get that e-mail itself.
>
> That was probably your spam filter. Gmane seems to be listed on
> several black and white lists, so what your filter makes of this can
> be pretty arbitrary, this is what my spamasassin says:
Never let a spam filter decide what you receive, only its default
dispensation when it reaches your MUA. I get enough false positives to
make this policy a necessity. (Some false negatives, too...)
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,RCVD_NUME
>RIC_HELO
>
> - Florian
Randall Schulz
--
Daniel C. Sobral
Something I learned in academia: there are three kinds of academic reviews: review by name, review by reference and review by value.
