« Return to Thread: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
by Matthew Flaschen
::
Rate this Message:
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Timothy McIntyre (tmcintyre@...):
>
>> Essentially, I think the SocialText license should be approved for the
>> same reasons that the OSI approved the Attribution Assurance License.
>
> You mean, for the "reason" of having not, at that time, yet gotten around
> to writing OSD provision #10? That reason would seem to no longer apply.
Not to mention the subtle yet significant differences between AAL and
GAP that I reviewed earlier
(http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:msp:12136:ccpbmhndbgpfnpnikjbp).
Matthew Flaschen
> Quoting Timothy McIntyre (tmcintyre@...):
>
>> Essentially, I think the SocialText license should be approved for the
>> same reasons that the OSI approved the Attribution Assurance License.
>
> You mean, for the "reason" of having not, at that time, yet gotten around
> to writing OSD provision #10? That reason would seem to no longer apply.
Not to mention the subtle yet significant differences between AAL and
GAP that I reviewed earlier
(http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:msp:12136:ccpbmhndbgpfnpnikjbp).
Matthew Flaschen
signature.asc (260 bytes) « Return to Thread: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
